
StudiOwens South Park is Back with New Episodes March 17 at 10p/9c !
about 12 hours ago from web

StudiOwens Trying to figure out if Google Apps Outlook Sync is good enough for the boss, so everyone else in the company can use Gmail and Google Docs.
1 day ago from web

StudiOwens @eafarris 1024-bit RSA encryption cracked by carefully starving CPU of electricity http://bit.ly/blHgGm
1 day ago from web

StudiOwens While Google might not be the first to do mobile search with images, they sure do it well. http://bit.ly/dtt0rw
1 day ago from web
Example 8 in the Endorsement Guides (view as PDF) gives a good example of the FTC's stance. It talks about a popular MP3 message board with discussions on playback hardware for MP3s. The community is unaware that an employee of the leading MP3 device manufacturer has been posting messages about how great the new device is. The idea here is that knowledge of the poster's employment can affect the credibility of the endorsement. Thus this relationship should be blatantly announced to the board's community members.
In general it's just a good idea to disclose your employment when making comments about products your company manufacturers, distributes, or sells. I know in the forums I visit, when users post advertisements for products and it comes to light that it was an employee trolling the threads, the company usually takes a hit in credibility with those forum members. Where as, an employee who is upfront about their employment, and actually engages in a discussion of their product, is viewed with some degree of respect for taking the time to answer questions and be part of the community discussion.
I personally think this is the big disconnect between the online community, and people from the old school print advertisement business world. Those old school guys just see the online world as cheap print advertisement, and try to flood everyone with everything they can. They just don't seem to care if they are upfront or hidden with their methods and motives. They also like buzz words like Twitter, and social networking, but don't have a clue about what it means to join in these communication channels. It isn't a one way street where they can just pound us with junk mail and advertisements in magazines, these new emerging technologies, and social networks, are tools for two way discussions.
My advice to the corporate buzz-word-centered-world is this, be upfront with your personal company relationships and join us in a discussion about your products. I for one will appreciate that more, than your sneaky ad spam techniques.
I don't care if you give free stuff to Bloggers. Keep it up. In fact give me some free stuff. Of course if you give me free stuff and it sucks balls, I'll tell people how you gave me free stuff that sucks balls. LOL. I'm so tired of cheap consumer grade crap.
I personally have decided to sign the Blog with Integrity Pledge (www.blogwithintegrity.com). This pledge isn't going to change anything at Studio-Owens.com, because I have always done those things that the Pledge stands for.
No Responses to "FTC Guidelines for Bloggers and I pledge to Blog with Integrity"
Add A CommentLeave a Comment